Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Whassup with Federer?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jeffreycounts
    replied
    This Federer - Nalbandian match is enormous in my opinion. Nalbandian has one of the best records against Federer, and the surface is definitely in Nalbandian's favor. And Nalbandian seems to really peak at Master's events.

    If Federer can win this one, it would be a huge boost for his confidence. I don't think he can win, but I hope he puts up a good fight and can somehow pull it out.

    Leave a comment:


  • uspta146749877
    replied
    the coach

    Originally posted by ochi View Post
    It's April 24 and Roger has beaten Gael Mofils, 3 and 4. Actually, lackadaisical Monfils beat himself. Roger cut his unforceds from 54 in three sets yesterday to 21 in two sets, still a whole lot. Until the latter part of the second set, he appeared to be reducing the number by deliberately easing up, which resulted in scores of shots, mostly forehands, landing around Monfils' service line. But Monfils did not step in to put them away, as Nadal, Davydenko, Ferrer and many others would have. It was a dull match. Roger got away with another one. I bet his practices would be more fun to watch.

    Whassup is still the question.
    The coach-please read

    Leave a comment:


  • ochi
    replied
    It's April 24 and Roger has beaten Gael Mofils, 3 and 4. Actually, lackadaisical Monfils beat himself. Roger cut his unforceds from 54 in three sets yesterday to 21 in two sets, still a whole lot. Until the latter part of the second set, he appeared to be reducing the number by deliberately easing up, which resulted in scores of shots, mostly forehands, landing around Monfils' service line. But Monfils did not step in to put them away, as Nadal, Davydenko, Ferrer and many others would have. It was a dull match. Roger got away with another one. I bet his practices would be more fun to watch.

    Whassup is still the question.

    Leave a comment:


  • ochi
    replied
    Temporary(?) coach Jose Higueros had better straighten this out, or Roger will fall to no. 3 this year. I'm a Federer fan, but don't want to hear more about how a real champion comes through when he's off his game. It was true today, but wouldn't have been against a much higher ranker player, I think. He might go back into genius mode tomorrow, April 24, but I'm afraid it might be sporadic through the rest of the season. I hope that Higueros can spark him the way Connors energized Roddick. The thought of staying on top for so long is beyond understanding -- Borg' single-mindedness, going back to hotel rooms to read Donald Duck in Swedish; Sampras driven to hit the practice courts and to excel in every match, face the press once again, then eat and go back to his room; Roger obliging the relentless pressures to appear, here, there and everywhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeffreycounts
    replied
    Originally posted by lukman41985 View Post
    All of this will be fixed when he wins the French. You heard it here first. This whole season has been building for that and why Roger hasn't been in a panic.
    Federer wins the French and then gets a Gold Medal and salvages the season.

    His near loss to a qualifier does't look good right now, but if he could somehow win the French, it would redeem the entire season, no doubt.

    Leave a comment:


  • uspta146749877
    replied
    coach

    Originally posted by ochi View Post
    It's April 23 and Federer is down, 5-1, to Ramirez Hidalgo in his first round match in Monte Carlo. His new coach is staring down; I can't see much of his face. Somehow, Federer gets his game on track, wins it in a tiebreaker, after 54 unforced errors, mostly off his forehand, as usual. Unbelievable. This has been going on for at least a year. Why can't he/doesn't he fix it? Don't keep suggesting lingering mono. He stays on court, to receive the 2007 ATP Player of the Year award. It would have been damned awkward if he had lost to Hidalgo, who got tight in the 'breaker.
    Question: what a new coach can do ?

    Leave a comment:


  • lukman41985
    replied
    All of this will be fixed when he wins the French. You heard it here first. This whole season has been building for that and why Roger hasn't been in a panic.

    Leave a comment:


  • ochi
    replied
    another tidal wave of gift points

    It's April 23 and Federer is down, 5-1, to Ramirez Hidalgo in his first round match in Monte Carlo. His new coach is staring down; I can't see much of his face. Somehow, Federer gets his game on track, wins it in a tiebreaker, after 54 unforced errors, mostly off his forehand, as usual. Unbelievable. This has been going on for at least a year. Why can't he/doesn't he fix it? Don't keep suggesting lingering mono. He stays on court, to receive the 2007 ATP Player of the Year award. It would have been damned awkward if he had lost to Hidalgo, who got tight in the 'breaker.
    Last edited by ochi; 04-23-2008, 04:59 AM. Reason: add

    Leave a comment:


  • uspta146749877
    replied
    Federer and Monte Carlo

    Originally posted by crosscourt View Post
    I think he played better in that first set. Difficult to tell though if Davydenko had an injury. But the serve he lost at the start of the second was a good example of the way he has been playing. Ineffective shots -- angled slices going nowhere -- and lethargic movement (by his standards). It may all be part of a grand plan -- I hope it is -- but it seems hopeful at the moment.

    cc
    What is a draw for Federer at Monte Carlo?
    Last edited by uspta146749877; 04-23-2008, 03:41 PM. Reason: spelling

    Leave a comment:


  • crosscourt
    replied
    Originally posted by uspta146749877 View Post
    What about a first set vs Davydenko?
    I think he played better in that first set. Difficult to tell though if Davydenko had an injury. But the serve he lost at the start of the second was a good example of the way he has been playing. Ineffective shots -- angled slices going nowhere -- and lethargic movement (by his standards). It may all be part of a grand plan -- I hope it is -- but it seems hopeful at the moment.

    cc

    Leave a comment:


  • ochi
    replied
    what do stringers think?

    Federer's problem -- unforced forehand errors -- is beginning to be cited in news accounts now.

    I tracked this last year, every time his matches were shown on TV. I did not chart it, but it seemed that he averaged 15 per set, most of them forehand. Yet, because of the beauties, his forehands kept being praised in general!

    Considering his brilliance, why has he hit wide and long so often? My guess is his low string tension -- 46-47 lbs, according to past Aussie Open charts on the WWW. I'm supposing he hasn't changed it, and that he should try increasing it by a pound or two. Who since John McEnroe, playing with a stiff, small-head club (ever try one?), has strung that low with a small head and had a low percentage of UE?

    Leave a comment:


  • uspta146749877
    replied
    a new coach

    Originally posted by uspta146749877 View Post
    What about a first set vs Davydenko?
    A clay part of the season is always difficult-footwork,sliding,etc
    A new coach will provide some obvious input so I think
    a new coach should help.Chemistry between a player
    and a coach is always an issue but both of them are very experienced.
    Some confidence will come back around Wimbledon.

    Leave a comment:


  • uspta146749877
    replied
    What about the first set vs Davydenko?

    Originally posted by crosscourt View Post
    I have watched Federer's matches at Estoril this week from TV/tapes. It is difficult to say exactly what is going wrong. At a guess there is something physical and something mental, though it's not obvious which would come first. He looks as if he not moving as well as normal. Whather that is a purely physical thing, or whether he has lost confidence/concentration I can't say.

    His firs set against Rochus was not good. Federer played well for a couple of games and looked to be right on his game. But Rochus, who is a very good player, fought hard, got his nose in front and pulled away. Federer's bachand was not awful, and there were as ever some flashy winners, but the number of poor backhands including outrageous shanks and some balls in the bottom of the net, was as bad as I have seen. Rochus, by the way, has a very good one handed back hand for a clay court.

    In the second and third sets neither player played well. Rochus struggled with his serve, Federer served better.

    Hanescu's was a poor match, as was the match against Gil who is too one dimensional. Grimmelmayer is a better player than he looks, but if Federer was anywhere near his best Grimmelmayer would have to play out of his skin to win a set. He didn't play out of his skin yesterday.

    Watching it is depressing. Of course, it may all come right for Federer before the French but at the moment it's difficult to be confident of that.

    The other players may have got better and more confident. Losing to Fish, who was on a roll, was not a disater for a player who has been ill. Losing to Roddick probably shows as clearly as losing a set to Grimmelmayer that Federer is not at his best. My feeling though is that ths present problem wont be cured by getting a coach -- though I wouldn't advocate not getting one if he wants one.
    What about a first set vs Davydenko?

    Leave a comment:


  • crosscourt
    replied
    I have watched Federer's matches at Estoril this week from TV/tapes. It is difficult to say exactly what is going wrong. At a guess there is something physical and something mental, though it's not obvious which would come first. He looks as if he not moving as well as normal. Whather that is a purely physical thing, or whether he has lost confidence/concentration I can't say.

    His firs set against Rochus was not good. Federer played well for a couple of games and looked to be right on his game. But Rochus, who is a very good player, fought hard, got his nose in front and pulled away. Federer's bachand was not awful, and there were as ever some flashy winners, but the number of poor backhands including outrageous shanks and some balls in the bottom of the net, was as bad as I have seen. Rochus, by the way, has a very good one handed back hand for a clay court.

    In the second and third sets neither player played well. Rochus struggled with his serve, Federer served better.

    Hanescu's was a poor match, as was the match against Gil who is too one dimensional. Grimmelmayer is a better player than he looks, but if Federer was anywhere near his best Grimmelmayer would have to play out of his skin to win a set. He didn't play out of his skin yesterday.

    Watching it is depressing. Of course, it may all come right for Federer before the French but at the moment it's difficult to be confident of that.

    The other players may have got better and more confident. Losing to Fish, who was on a roll, was not a disater for a player who has been ill. Losing to Roddick probably shows as clearly as losing a set to Grimmelmayer that Federer is not at his best. My feeling though is that ths present problem wont be cured by getting a coach -- though I wouldn't advocate not getting one if he wants one.

    Leave a comment:


  • airforce1
    replied
    harder than I thought, I would have never got that spelling, but he had an incredible serve.
    If he had stayed healthier, Pete would not have the same records I don't think.
    At worst, he was a terrible matchup for Pete.

    Leave a comment:

Who's Online

Collapse

There are currently 6472 users online. 3 members and 6469 guests.

Most users ever online was 183,544 at 03:22 AM on 03-17-2025.

Working...
X