Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Have a Question for Me?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • stotty
    replied
    Originally posted by johnyandell View Post
    I don't know what Dan means by snap. Waiting to get his book. I would love to have some high speed footage of Sock. Don't. I get a little tired of this argument. It's not usually based on detailed analysis of the players where the claim is made. Again the there is no conscious forward flexion. The muscles actually work to restrain it. I am sure if I live to be 100 there will still be coaches telling players to snap the wrist on the forehand and the serve.
    An excerpt from Dan's book. I believe he derived this info from ESPN Sports Science:

    He (Roger) snaps his wrist about one-tenth of a second before impact with an angular momentum of about 900 degrees per second. The acceleration of the wrists accounts for only 30 percent of his overall racquet speed....

    I just wonder when Dan refers to "snapping" he is simply referring to closing/aligning the wrist just before contact as oppose to during contact and after, which is the way I see it.

    I was really thinking more about the practical benefits of using wrist. I think it facilitates quicker wielding of the racket, important in a fast moving game. I know McEnroe's forehand was simple, but when you try it, it actually eats up more time than you think to produce.

    I am half way through Dan's book...it's a good read.
    Last edited by stotty; 06-09-2015, 05:07 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    I don't know what Dan means by snap. Waiting to get his book. I would love to have some high speed footage of Sock. Don't. I get a little tired of this argument. It's not usually based on detailed analysis of the players where the claim is made. Again the there is no conscious forward flexion. The muscles actually work to restrain it. I am sure if I live to be 100 there will still be coaches telling players to snap the wrist on the forehand and the serve.

    Leave a comment:


  • stotty
    replied
    John

    Not sure if you've read Daniel McCain's book yet but in it he talks how Federer snaps his wrist. I know you're not a believer in wrist snapping but can I run something by you.

    In the case of Jack Sock, who seems incredibly wristy, how can his wristyness be explained? Is he just wristy prior to aligning the wrist up before contact...and does his wrist go passive just prior to contact and thereafter? Is his wrist contributing any power? is there any benefit in being more wristy...or does excessive wristyness make most of us more prone to error?

    I find Sock's forehand downright amazing to watch. I would love to see his forehand slowed right down so I could take a look at what's going on in there.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    Looks great.

    Leave a comment:


  • gzhpcu
    replied
    John, is this enough pointing of the left arm to the sideline?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEsU_dePZS0

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    Well he hits a lot of spin. Very extreme grip. Double bend. I wouldn't say that spin levels is what makes a forehand great though.

    Leave a comment:


  • stroke
    replied
    Originally posted by johnyandell View Post
    You don't ask a controversial question, now do you? I have spent way too much time arguing about this on the TW boards, looking at video, learning from Brian Gordon...

    BUT the answer is not simple. The myth of the wrist article made the point--still correct--that the huge majority of forehands are hit with the wrist laid back. But some of the extreme grip forehands are hit with neutral wrists--though not all--and my continued video analysis shows the amount of lay back also varies from shot to shot. An inside out forehand--most lay back. A short crosscourt, closer to neutral.

    So what then? If I understand Brian G., the motion of the wrist is like a hinge. As the racket pivots this motion adds racket speed due to centripetal force. But also if I understand Brian, the actual muscle activity of players is not a forward flex that makes this happen. In fact the players are actually contracting against this flex to slow it down.

    Why? To orient the racket at the right angle for the shot line at contact. Confused yet?

    I think that keeping the wrist back all the way through the swing is the simplest way for lower level players to develop a forehand. But if the arm is relaxed and the wrist releases the right amount at the right time, it probably does add racket speed--but not from the conscious effort to snap.
    John, I remember in Brian's articles he stated that more eastern type grips led to more wrist extenison on on the forehand. I have always felt that this wrist extension(and resulting wrist flexion), along with the straight arm configration, was one of the main defining attributes that seperates Nadal and Federer's forehands. Then along comes Jack Sock who definately has a different forehand from Nadal and Fed. I was watching some tournament on TV that had spin tracker technology and showed that Sock was getting slightly more spin on his forehand than even Nadal.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    Look at this:



    Could be happening more or not or maybe you just are noticing it more, but it's been around for a decade or more as a regular element.

    Leave a comment:


  • jimlosaltos
    replied
    link

    Originally posted by johnyandell View Post
    It's the start of an extreme windshield wiper. The hitting arm and racket are rotated down--they will rotate up to the contact and continue to rotate in the finish. It's part of what Brian Gordon would call an extreme flip.
    Thanks. I can find one reference on TPN here:


    By my unscientific observation, this seems much more widely used of late.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    You ask great questions. Most need more research...but you might like the articles on the stances that address some of this. A lot of the questions don't have straight yes or no answers. CC v. Down the L for example is a matter of a few degrees change in the angle of the racket face while stance and biomechanics seem identical in most cases.

    Here is the stance article: the animations visually address many of the issues:

    Leave a comment:


  • privas
    replied
    One-handed backhand weight transfer

    Mr Yandell, you have put together some great video lessons on the one-handed backhand over the years in your Advanced Tennis section. You've explored just about every aspect of this mysterious stroke.

    Forgive me if I've missed and/or skipped this particular lesson. However, I don't think I've seen a lesson devoted specifically to the footwork involved in the one-handed backhand weight transfer: slice vs drive, down-the-line vs cross court. What is the back foot supposed to be doing, besides guiding the torso, getting to the unit turn, and maintaining position to keep the torso turned during the stroke? When should the back foot go up in the air vs being dragged? When does the back foot stay still through the stroke? Is there a difference between down-the-line vs cross court? Is there a role for high speed video for this? Just a thought. Because I can't think of anything else you haven't covered yet!

    --Pedro

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    It's the start of an extreme windshield wiper. The hitting arm and racket are rotated down--they will rotate up to the contact and continue to rotate in the finish. It's part of what Brian Gordon would call an extreme flip.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    It's the start of an extreme windshield wiper. The hitting arm and racket are rotated down--they will rotate up to the contact and continue to rotate in the finish. It's part of what Brian Gordon would call an extreme flip.

    Leave a comment:


  • jimlosaltos
    replied
    Standing racket on its head

    [QUOTE=johnyandell;2]

    John,

    I've noticed more instances of ATP players hitting low forehands with their racket almost on end, that is the head pointed at the court, the handle vertical. Their wrists aren't merely laid back, but the racket pointing down. What are your thoughts on this, and is it a deliberate technique or an accident of court position? Something to emulate, or avoid?

    Perhaps I've been unobservant, but I don't recall seeing this happening constantly in the past. Two photo examples I took at BNP Indian Wells. I suppose one could argue that Raonic is simply jammed, but Fed had plenty of time to create more space if he wanted to. Thank you! / jim

    1) Raonic. Note that he's hitting from outside his doubles alley.

    BNPIW15Raonic9 by james.fawcette, on Flickr

    2) Fed, at midcourt.

    Fed Forehand Low vertical takeback 018 by james.fawcette, on Flickr

    end.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    Stotty,

    I feel certain you are up to it.

    Leave a comment:

Who's Online

Collapse

There are currently 8696 users online. 2 members and 8694 guests.

Most users ever online was 183,544 at 03:22 AM on 03-17-2025.

Working...
X