
Great article and wonderful tribute to John Yandell. I remember when I first joined TennisPlayer.net there was a fellow named Geoff Williams who was advocating John for the Tennis Hall of Fame. Being new to the site I thought it was just some yokel sucking up to the owner for brownie points. That was some fifteen years ago.
Visual Tennis and "The Winning Edge" certainly are important landmarks in John's career. Those videos of John McEnroe and Ivan Lendl turn out to be sheer genius in retrospect. I believe those videos were actually done in 1984. Ah...the Orwellian year. Coincidentally the same year that tennis entered its own Orwellian phase and McEnroe and Lendl certainly captured the essence of this in their rivalry. Somehow John was at the exact precise point in time and space to have the wherewithal to produce such a masterpiece. Somehow John's legacy in in the remarkable timing of his work and the inflection point in history that tennis was precariously balancing on. How many times have I written on this forum about the 1984 U. S. Open and made the statement that this was the first time in tennis history where all four men's semifinalist's used oversized graphite racquets? The two finalists at that seismic event? None other than the two stars of John's epic "The Winning Edge"...John McEnroe and Ivan Lendl. I was there on the scene at Flushing Meadows. I saw every match that magic Saturday that Bud Collins claimed was the greatest day in tennis ever. He may have been right in more ways than one. He was speaking of the level of tennis but he never mentioned once the crossing of the rubicon into "Modern Tennis" as exemplified by the equipment.
If this website in its totality is not the legacy of John Yandell then I am missing something. John and I are the same age. We were brought up at a magical time in the tennis world and obviously tennis had a great impact on both of our lives...as it did millions of others. John was about fourteen years old when the game went open. That is...when professional's were allowed to play in the Grand Slam events in 1968. The game virtually exploded into the public domain from that point forwards. John was old enough to have been schooled in the traditional school of tennis, The white clothes. The white balls. Tennis etiquette. Most importantly...wooden racquets. John cut his teeth on classic tennis. He was on the edge. When it tipped...he was there to capitalize on the fallout. He was a bridge between the classic era and the ensuing make believe tennis. But he captured it. With his video. With his analysis. With his attitude. Hall of Fame material? Yes...why not?
May God bless John. He was an important man in my life these past fifteen years. He knew what I was talking about in the romance of the old game. He never once criticized me for this thread and the commentary in it. I put my heart and soul into this forum and John knew it. He even appreciated it. He gave me VIP status here. Behind the scenes. John pretty much left the forum alone. He left it up to the members to pretty much breath life into it. Every once in a while he would step in to mediate. He was the Boss. A good one and a fair one. A couple of years ago we lost Roger Federer on the playing field. Roger...being the last remaining link. Between the classic era and the modern era. The Living Proof in the don_budge paradigm for teaching tennis. John felt the same way. I believe he agreed with me that the game was in trouble when Roger left. At least in for some big changes. They are coming too.
Wonderful article and a great tribute to John. His passing really hit me. It still effects me. The website will be an interesting thing to watch without his influence. They say nobody is irreplaceable. John just might set the record straight on that. We will have to wait and see.

Leave a comment: