Would love to hear your thoughts on my latest article, "A New Teaching System: Part 1: Introduction"!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A New Teaching System: Part 1: Introduction
Collapse
X
-
Great Intro
Great introduction...ambitious...yet grounded. If life had a fast forward button, I would be pressing it to get to the next article as fast as possible. I can't wait, John...simply can't wait.Originally posted by johnyandell View PostWould love to hear your thoughts on my latest article, "A New Teaching System: Part 1: Introduction"!
Stotty
-
Wow!
I can't wait to use the video system to better compare my strokes to the pros.
In the infrequent video I do now, I am always amazed to readily see the areas I need to tweak.
The difference between what I think I am doing and what I actually do is usually apparent.
But I have never had a "system" to this on a regular basis.
I look forward to incorporate a disciplined analysis to improve my game.
(And even though I will never have the full range of motion and power of the best, better understanding what the pros do is satisfying in itself.)
Thank you so much for taking Tennisplayer.net to this next level!
Comment
-
" I have tried not only to demonstrate what top players were actually doing, but to explain the implications for players at all levels."
This is the sites' mission in a nut shell. For me, the biggest gain I can make is through fh and serve. I just can't seem to perfect those shots. We can all relate to being blocked/stagnant in our own games/frame of mind.
Comment
-
A Swing and a Miss. . .
I agree. While reading it the writing old phrase "show me, don't tell me" came to mind throughout.Originally posted by bman View PostDisappointing...I was hoping to learn something in this article. As it turns out it was just a tease.
When I viewed the new edition I was disappointed. The introduction being published as an independent article in the series was a waste of a valuable article slot. I, like every-other TP.net subscriber come here to learn. I fail to see the need to reiterate or sell TP.net readers to the fact that they can learn from technology and from what the pros do. This is why we subscribe and what you have been pioneering with TP.net from the beginning.Originally posted by johnyandell View PostBman,
Come on! The approach is critical. The rest will be worth waiting for.
-Shaun
Comment
-
I didn't state that I didn't want to see or that the methodology should not be outlined. I simply think it was a waste for an introduction alone to take a full article slot in place of actual content.Originally posted by johnyandell View PostOK I get it you didn't want the methodology outlined. To me it's important and critical. Hope you like the upcoming articles more!
As an editor and publisher would you accept and publish an introduction alone from contributors?
-Shaun
Comment
-
That does not sound like a introduction to me; which by definition is "a beginning section which states the purpose and goals of the following writing." It sounds like a narrative essay on the process of change that has occurred. But we'll see when it comes out.Originally posted by johnyandell View PostWell yes of course. In fact next month Rick Macci has one taking about his conversion to the use of 3D analysis at his academy with the technology of Brian Gordon.
As paying subscribers we should give constructive feedback.Originally posted by bman View PostRemind me not to read that one.
Now, so that I do not come off as a complete jerk, I just want to say that I am really looking forward to your series. I am sure it will generate lots of valuable discussion.Last edited by sfrazeur; 02-21-2013, 11:11 AM.
Comment
-
introduction is deserved
[QUOTE=johnyandell;20363]Would love to hear your thoughts on my latest article, "A New Teaching System: Part 1: Introduction"

Comment