Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

(shaking head)John, John, John

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • (shaking head)John, John, John

    When you learned how to read, you didn't start with shakespeare or Kafka.
    You walked before you ran. Used training wheels on your bike.
    To talk, potty training, a different language, tying shoes, or velcro if you grew up in the 80's.

    All these things started slowly and very tough to learn, but once learned became natural. When you learned to read it was so slow, but now you don't think about it. Or walking, riding a bike. These things became natural to you.

    In reading your article on the Myth of the Tennis Tip, are you saying that the pro never went to the other side and showed the player visually how the stroke should look? Didn't physically touch and guide their hand through the motion?

    When advanced players hit a forehand, they don't think, grip, turn, racket up, drop level or below ball, swing upwards, finish near shoulders, recover.
    But these are all things the beginning player thinks about. And will continue to do until it becomes natural. And that's done through repetition.

    Now here is where the tennis tip comes in. It should be a verbal que(reminder) of something shown and guided. So when we say to our students, finish your swing, or swing up, or pronation on the serve, keep the edge, all these are ques used after being shown or physically guided through that motion.

    Where it goes wrong is with teaching pros who would rather be in the bar than on the court teaching. Some pros get discouraged, don't care, are burned out, or just simply lazy. Other pros just are not informed, they are teaching from their experience playing or things they were told when they were learning. Many of these things are out dated or just plain wrong. These are the pros your describing.

    We learn best when we use a combination of all these tools.
    To develop a player it takes three things
    A dedicated student
    A dedicated parent
    A dedicated knowledgable teacher


    James

  • #2
    James,

    Actually I agree with everything you are saying. The point of the article is that the majority of the lessons I have observed--probably a few thousand by now, unfortunately--relied overwhelming only on verbal input from the other side of the net. It's great to hear from teachers out there who are using an approach based on the way players really learn. We need more of them and inch by inch--particularly with the use of video, this seems to be happening.

    I agree that once a physical/visual model is established it can be keyed by a word or two or three from the coach. But the guiding, visualizing, and critically important video feedback are what make that possible. And the player still has to process it sall ubsconsciously as imagery/feeling which is what I think good players do and why they can't talk about it in words--or prefer not to.

    A player, a parent, a coach. Have to agree that's the right trinity there.

    John Yandell

    Comment

    Who's Online

    Collapse

    There are currently 7733 users online. 21 members and 7712 guests.

    Most users ever online was 31,715 at 05:06 AM on 03-05-2024.

    Working...
    X