Tweet
Originally posted by stotty
View Post
-
Please share your thoughts when you do
-
Super high level tennis. I don't think I have ever seen Carlos play so aggressively. He outhit Sinner.Last edited by stroke; 10-02-2024, 04:33 PM.Comment
-
Absolutely. Carlos had a clear plan and really went after it. None of the hesitance we saw at the Australian Open. I wish they'd shown some forehand speed numbers.Originally posted by stroke View Post
Still, at the end Sinner was up 6-5 Carlos serving, then in the tiebreak went ahead 3-0 and missed a service winner by inches that would have been 4-0.
Woulda' Coulda'.
filedata/fetch?id=105604&d=1727979271&type=thumb
I was surprised to see in the final stats that Sinner actually won more points from the baseline, but Carlos was +12 at the net (19/31 vs 7/20) although Carlos had a ridiculous 55 winners vs 52 errors in 3 sets! -- better than doubling Jannik on his forehand ( 36 winners vs 17 )
I could say that was the difference but to me Sinner hasn't had his "A" service for a while. As good as Carlos' return game is, Sinner shouldn't be winning only 66% of first serves on a hard court IMGI,
filedata/fetch?id=105605&d=1727979271&type=thumb
#You do not have permission to view this gallery.
This gallery has 2 photos.Last edited by jimlosaltos; 10-03-2024, 03:13 PM.Comment
-
No doubt it could have gone either way. They both played a hell of a match. Nothing really separates them.Comment
-
You might be interested by this online exchange the match inspired.Originally posted by stroke View Post
First Mats Wilander told Eurosport:
"I hope Roger, Novak and Rafa are not listening. But in terms of level, when Sinner and Alcaraz are at their best, there is no way anyone has ever played better tennis.
This inspired Alex Dolgopolov to post (from the Ukrainian war front, presumably over Starlink ? ):
Sorry Mats, I rarely watch any tennis lately, but accidentally watched these highlights and my opinion is probably worthless. Tend to strongly disagree, big 3 had way higher level of understanding the heights, pace changes and angles. On a good day would never pick present stars
Comment
-
Here is an 8:10 min YT highlight video of the Sinner-Alcaraz Beijing final that's well worth a watch, whether you've seen the match or not! From TennisTV
Comment
-
It is good to hear the thoughts of a couple of guys who were out there and really know what is up. To me, they both have valid points. The ferocity of the ball striking to me somewhat reminiscent of Nadal Fed 2017 AO Final. That being said, it is way too early to me to put either anywhere close to the big 3 and what they accomplished at the Majors and Master 1000's. Nadal FO accomplishments to me still the single most impressive record in all of sports. And Novak won every Masters 1000 twice. Just mind boggling.Comment
-
I am half way through watching the replay. The standard is as high as you're going to see in my view. The first set had more errors that you might see with the Big 3 but then they are hitting at times is even harder and with a more risk-taking approach. Carlos hits the ball so cleanly and powerfully that it's a sight to behold.
It's not just about how well you can play, though. It's all about seeing what needs to be done and stepping up. I couldn't see Novak winning that Olympic medal until the last ball was struck. That massive cross court winner in the tiebreak and that match point winner from the baseline were Novak seeing what absolutely had to be done and executing. Without that outstanding tiebreak and those two shots he might have lost.
Only time will tell if we can rank Carlos and Sinner up there with the Big 3. I am optimistic, however.StottyComment
Comment