Originally posted by johnyandell
View Post
When I was younger volume hitting held a significant place in my coaching....hit lots of balls and somehow things might get better. Lots of coaches taught that way back then.
Some journalists over here went to Bollettieri's and found high volume hitting everywhere; coaches with big trolleys endlessly running players from side to side. Mostly, they found the coaching unobservant and ineffective. Nevertheless, some truly great players emerged from that academy.
I guess what we can deduce from this is that it's less about the coach and more about the player and what he/she brings to the table in terms of sheer ability. The value of coaching is extremely hard to quantify and probably varies depending on the knowledge of the coach and the receptiveness of the players. Coaching might perhaps only account for 10 or 20% of a player's development. On the upside that 10 or 20% could be extremely important if we do our job right.
John, don't let this go to your head but you've been playing a big role in improving coaches' knowledge and it's starting to show here and there round the world. Yep, I do believe you've gone global.

Leave a comment: