Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Still Think ELC is Infallible?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Still Think ELC is Infallible?

    Zverev's photo of ball mark called "in" by electronic line system.

    The don't believe that even by the most generous interpretation of "ball blooming" or "fuzz tendrils touching the tape" that his was in.

    My copy was forwarded by another player, John Millman, who wrote: "I think on the most part electronic line calling takes out a lot of the internal debate for a player… until this happens.. no doubt these rogue calls happen weekly..​"

    filedata/fetch?id=107033&d=1745792771&type=thumb

    #
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 1 photos.

  • #2
    I've always thought this system was not 100% accurate, but it is certainly treated as such. That is absolutely ridiculous if that was called in.

    Comment


    • #3
      I am not convinced this call was wrong, but either way, I do think the Hawkeye system makes less errors than the chair umpire constantly checking marks.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by jeffreycounts View Post
        I've always thought this system was not 100% accurate, but it is certainly treated as such. That is absolutely ridiculous if that was called in.
        There is some strange psychology at work that leads announcers and some players to act as if a system is infallible because it uses computers.

        This ball mark certainly appears to be outside the stated error margin for Hawkeye ( I believe the ATP standardized on Hawkeye rather than FoxTen for ELC }

        During trail periods with FoxTen we saw slow motion video where balls were called in that clearly looked out. HawkEye offers no such visual check since the cameras are higher and the actual ball "mark" shown in replays is merely a computer simulation. In some replays I've seen, the simulated ball mark didn't resemble what would be reasonably created by a shot, i.e. HawkEye's simulation had a long tail as if the ball skidded even through the ball came down sharply and jumped.

        I suspect tennis' Hawkeye is more reliable than lines people, but unlike systems in other sports there is no independent testing or analysis of tennis Hawkeye. Hawkeye is used in Major League Baseball, BUT that system has more sensors & MLB is more transparent about results.

        Comment

        Who's Online

        Collapse

        There are currently 15841 users online. 3 members and 15838 guests.

        Most users ever online was 183,544 at 03:22 AM on 03-17-2025.

        Working...
        X