Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Have a Question for Me?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • johnyandell
    replied
    Well said.

    Leave a comment:


  • doctorhl
    replied
    Originally posted by dpremsagar View Post
    Contact Point for Volleys and Slice?

    Hi John, a question about contact points. I've been taking aggressive swings for backhand slice with very frustrating results. Despite the shot making more than 50% errors in my practice I have been committed to fast swings hoping one day it will all fall into place. Simply didn't work. Either I dump into the net or the ball sails long.

    Then I read Scott Murphy's article about backhand slice. He mentions that the contact point needs to be a little later than it is for ground strokes. So, I tried 'pulling' the contact point to behind my front foot whereas it was in front of my front foot before. I have only practiced once after making this change but the results are very encouraging.

    But now, I'm not sure about the volleys. Since the backhand volley is arguably just a mini backhand slice, where should the contact point be? In front of the front foot or behind the front foot? Same question about the forehand volley as well.
    Down the line volleys definitely will require a contact behind the front foot and is critical to timing longer backswing volleys at the “T”. The same is true for the offensive drive slice. Both require, however that follow through maintains a carving follow through a locked wrist, with racket plane that is downward,forwardand carve ups or the downward,sideways and carve up on low ball driving slices. ( see Herman versus Federer).

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    Not at all!

    Leave a comment:


  • dpremsagar
    replied
    Thank you John. I will work on providing you video for that.

    Meanwhile I have a question about serve. I've been working on building my serve using the Federer model in your teaching system.
    The one thing I find excruciatingly difficult is tossing the ball accurately, probably due to "The Arms Up together" nature of that model.

    In Federer's motion, the racquet and serving arm are parallel to the ground by the time the ball leaves the tossing hand.
    In Sampras' motion, the racquet and serving arm are still vertical by the time the ball leaves the tossing hand.

    I find the Sampras style more suitable for me. I can focus 100% of my brain on tossing the ball accurately with my left arm and then focus 100% of my brain on the racquet arm.
    It might be argued that the racquet arm will have less time to get to the trophy position in the Sampras model, but I find that alright. The benefit of having to focus on only one arm at a time is worth that cost.

    It is hard enough to focus on placing the ball toss properly by itself, it becomes even harder when I also need to pay attention to my right arm at the same time.

    What are your thoughts? Are there any significant negatives of adopting Sampras' rhythm to get to the trophy position?

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    D,
    Really hard to tell without seeing it. Do you have video? Probably an issue with amount of windshield wiper but video would tell. iphone 240 fps please. As for grip, hold the racket tight enough that a bird in your hand would stay put but don't strangle it!

    Leave a comment:


  • dpremsagar
    replied
    Hi John, I have 2 questions for you today.

    1. Question regarding short and low forehands : I have modeled my forehand based on your forehand series in the Teaching Systems. While my stock forehand is so much better, if I ever get a forehand short and bouncing no higher than my knee level, either I hit it in the net or hit it too long. I have been pondering over this for weeks and I think I might be on to something. I wonder if the solution to this problem is with the racquet take back on preparation. For a low, short ball, the regular backswing causes too much forward velocity and not enough spin. Perhaps the solution is to shorten how far back the racquet goes in the backswing and also taking it much lower? I'm very curious to know your thoughts on this. If this was covered in some article, that would be quite helpful too.


    2. Question about how tight to hold the racquet : I have asked this question already, but this is still such a conundrum for me, so I'm coming up with this theory. What I notice is that on my forehands, serves and BH slice, during the forward swing of the racquet, there is a point where the racquet handle comes out of contact with the knuckle pad of the index finger. This doesn't happen on my FH slice and 2handed BH. So, I'm wondering if the solution is to grip the handle throughout the stroke just tight enough that at no point does the handle lose contact with the knuckle-pad of the index finger.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    Sean,
    Can't disagree. It goes to show that biomechanical perfection is not equal to greatness.

    Leave a comment:


  • seano
    replied
    John -

    Serena is often credited with having a tremendous serve, one of the best women's serves of all time. From a purely bio-mechanical/technical perspective, wouldn't you say she has deficiencies in her motion? I'll list some and if you could give me your thoughts.

    1) Doesn't necessarily load her rear hip "back and down". it's more of pushing her front hip forward.
    2) Racquet drops down the back before the legs drive up. Doesn't synchronize the upper and lower body.
    3) Racquet has more a "forward entry" in the backswing, moving more front to back , limiting her ability to have a diagonal swing plane, thus limiting her ability to externally rotate her shoulder.
    4) Looks like her hips and shoulders are facing the net at contact, not more sideways.

    Thanks for your input,

    Sean

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    Check these out:

    https://www.tennisplayer.net/members...rehand_volley/
    https://www.tennisplayer.net/members/ultimate_fundamentals/john_yandell/the_backhand_volle
    y As these pieces show the contact point can vary somewhat. The keys are having the other fundamentals solid. Also search up the Pat Cash volley articles
    Last edited by johnyandell; 09-08-2020, 08:36 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dpremsagar
    replied
    Contact Point for Volleys and Slice?

    Hi John, a question about contact points. I've been taking aggressive swings for backhand slice with very frustrating results. Despite the shot making more than 50% errors in my practice I have been committed to fast swings hoping one day it will all fall into place. Simply didn't work. Either I dump into the net or the ball sails long.

    Then I read Scott Murphy's article about backhand slice. He mentions that the contact point needs to be a little later than it is for ground strokes. So, I tried 'pulling' the contact point to behind my front foot whereas it was in front of my front foot before. I have only practiced once after making this change but the results are very encouraging.

    But now, I'm not sure about the volleys. Since the backhand volley is arguably just a mini backhand slice, where should the contact point be? In front of the front foot or behind the front foot? Same question about the forehand volley as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    Manish is looking into it.

    Leave a comment:


  • stotty
    replied
    I see that quickbooks guy keeps popping up. He's a bit like Djokovic...really hard to put away. Keep trying, John. There has to be a way to eliminate the sod.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    Yep. He doesn't show up in the members admin site. Trying to figure out how to get rid of him.

    Leave a comment:


  • stotty
    replied
    That quickbooks spammer is terribly persistent....

    Leave a comment:


  • johnyandell
    replied
    Great the closed face is working for you. One hand down the line can have less arm rotation. Dreams are good. Good tennis is better!

    Leave a comment:

Who's Online

Collapse

There are currently 8491 users online. 3 members and 8488 guests.

Most users ever online was 183,544 at 03:22 AM on 03-17-2025.

Working...
X