Originally posted by JeffMac
View Post
to discover that someone still hates me. Thank you bottle. You've saved me from irrelvancy. I was hoping to go to war with Kyle because he is too nice. If everyone was like Kyle we would have fewer wars, less suffering, more global prosperity and more happiness. That is a satirists worst nightmare! Which is why Kyle,
I must unfortunately consider you to be very dangerous and subversive. Nice, but troublesome, I'm afraid. You are a humanist. I am an involuntary misanthrope. Like the Nihilistic bottle, I believe.
But if I had to pick one person to rescue me from a burning building it would be you. Or Phil. Both of you.
I sense that you may be attempting to turn Phil against me. He may be even nicer than you. Another person threatening the satirist's world order.
No fun to provoke, because then I feel guilty. Which is why I fully appreciate bottle and budge--who like Watcher has gone into hiding and refuses too engage me.
So you Kyle are the good guy, and I play the villain. I used to be that good guy, but then I had several concussions and it changed my personality. Prior to 2010, I was a technically good, but rather boring writer. My TBI condition has caused me to become much edgier, greatly influencing my evolving literary style. I love gonzo journalism. But you knew that.
However Kyle, we'll always have Coto de Caza. Won't we? Which is to say that we may be very different, but we are brethren of the Cult of Braden, which surprisingly is not the case with everyone here.
But I know how to draw budge from out behind his Swedish mansion where he ponders the Nature of Suffering--much like the Budda himself who was also very, very wealthy. He is one of the world's most famous Recreational Existential Adventurers.
If I am ever to commune with budge I guess I must write about tennis. A topic that I have written troves about and now find very uninteresting. Now I feel a little bit like budge--complaining about the insignificant.
All I need to do to bring budge out like wack-a-mole himself is to bring up his favorite subject. Bill Scanlon.
I have recently been thinking the following: I was not aware that Scanlon--who really was just about as classically efficient as it gets--has wins over all of those Grand Slam Champs. With three wins over McEnroe! Thanks you for supplying that info budge--our unoffocial historian.
I know there is no precedent for this, but nevertheless I'm going to put it out there. Since Scanlon has these wins, I think that he should be enshrined at Newport Rhode Island, in the World Tennis Hall of Fame. I'd like to solicit opinions on this matter.
I must admit that I am partial to Scanlon. I got to meet him in either 1977 or '78. He was a very nice guy. I was introduced to him at Indian Wells when the tournament was played at Mission Hills. I'm sure that budge will be able to pin point the year when I tell him that McEnroe lost to Teltscher that year, I believe in three sets. I'm not sure. Two really ugly tennis games there, though. It took me quite a while to recover from that. Who remembers how Teltscher thrust his ass out backward on his topspin backhand?
My good friend Peter Pearson was in the tournament that year. He was a fringe ATP player who never got above about 120 in the world. He is now serving a life sentence in California for bank robbery, and other stuff. That's a whole other story for some other time.
I watched them play a practice match on one of the back courts. I just loved Scanlons clean, no frills game. In that era I also loved the way that Gerulaitus, Gottfried, Ramirez and Sandy Mayer played. Also simple, efficient, beautiful.
This is another reason, I must admit, I did not like McEnroe. He was quirky and unorthodox. Yes, a genius. But an ugly one.
So now budge--come out, come out wherever you are. Tell us what year Teltscher beat McEnroe. And whether you agree that Scanlon should be in the Hall.

But if I had to pick one person to rescue me from a burning building it would be you. Or Phil. Both of you.
I sense that you may be attempting to turn Phil against me. He may be even nicer than you. Another person threatening the satirist's world order.
No fun to provoke, because then I feel guilty. Which is why I fully appreciate bottle and budge--who like Watcher has gone into hiding and refuses too engage me.
So you Kyle are the good guy, and I play the villain. I used to be that good guy, but then I had several concussions and it changed my personality. Prior to 2010, I was a technically good, but rather boring writer. My TBI condition has caused me to become much edgier, greatly influencing my evolving literary style. I love gonzo journalism. But you knew that.
However Kyle, we'll always have Coto de Caza. Won't we? Which is to say that we may be very different, but we are brethren of the Cult of Braden, which surprisingly is not the case with everyone here.
But I know how to draw budge from out behind his Swedish mansion where he ponders the Nature of Suffering--much like the Budda himself who was also very, very wealthy. He is one of the world's most famous Recreational Existential Adventurers.
If I am ever to commune with budge I guess I must write about tennis. A topic that I have written troves about and now find very uninteresting. Now I feel a little bit like budge--complaining about the insignificant.
All I need to do to bring budge out like wack-a-mole himself is to bring up his favorite subject. Bill Scanlon.

I know there is no precedent for this, but nevertheless I'm going to put it out there. Since Scanlon has these wins, I think that he should be enshrined at Newport Rhode Island, in the World Tennis Hall of Fame. I'd like to solicit opinions on this matter.
I must admit that I am partial to Scanlon. I got to meet him in either 1977 or '78. He was a very nice guy. I was introduced to him at Indian Wells when the tournament was played at Mission Hills. I'm sure that budge will be able to pin point the year when I tell him that McEnroe lost to Teltscher that year, I believe in three sets. I'm not sure. Two really ugly tennis games there, though. It took me quite a while to recover from that. Who remembers how Teltscher thrust his ass out backward on his topspin backhand?
My good friend Peter Pearson was in the tournament that year. He was a fringe ATP player who never got above about 120 in the world. He is now serving a life sentence in California for bank robbery, and other stuff. That's a whole other story for some other time.
I watched them play a practice match on one of the back courts. I just loved Scanlons clean, no frills game. In that era I also loved the way that Gerulaitus, Gottfried, Ramirez and Sandy Mayer played. Also simple, efficient, beautiful.
This is another reason, I must admit, I did not like McEnroe. He was quirky and unorthodox. Yes, a genius. But an ugly one.
So now budge--come out, come out wherever you are. Tell us what year Teltscher beat McEnroe. And whether you agree that Scanlon should be in the Hall.

Kyle LaCroix USPTA
Boca Raton
Leave a comment: