I thought this article would promote some reaction!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Curse of Nadal
Collapse
X
-
This article is a bit adolescent. Great tennis is about rivalries, not about individual players. We wouldn't have had a McEnroe without a Borg, a Sampras without an Agassi. Iron sharpens iron. Nadal and Federer owe their greatness, in part, to each other.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Well said. What the current rivalries make you wonder is how things might has panned out if Borg and McEnroe had been rivals for longer. Their 14 matches against each other look like infancy compared to the Big 3's clashes against each other. Djokovic and Nadal have played each other 54 times!Originally posted by privas View PostThis article is a bit adolescent. Great tennis is about rivalries, not about individual players. We wouldn't have had a McEnroe without a Borg, a Sampras without an Agassi. Iron sharpens iron. Nadal and Federer owe their greatness, in part, to each other.Stotty
- Likes 1
Comment
-
The criticism of Nadal for his tics and machinelike game is silly. His discipline is what makes him amazing! Does anyone understand his own game better than Rafa? How is this looked at as a bad thing? The die hard Federer fans are just too much!
Comment
Who's Online
Collapse
There are currently 6732 users online. 3 members and 6729 guests.
Most users ever online was 183,544 at 03:22 AM on 03-17-2025.
- ejkantor ,


Comment